Posted by: Dirk | September 21, 2015

The Reincarnation of Keynesian Economics

While cleaning up my home office I found some old goodies, among them the paper with the title “The Reincarnation of Keynesian Economics” by Gregory Mankiw from 1991 published at NBER. Here is an extract:

Keynesian Proposition #3: Capitalist economies are threatened by the possibility of excessive saving, which could lead to secular stagnation: deficit spending is, therefore, good for the economy.

The author should be congratulated since secular stagnation is all the rage in today’s mainstream economics, and many economists argue for deficit spending. However, the full quote from the Mankiw paper reads (my highlighting):

Dubious Keynesian Proposition #3: Capitalist economies are threatened by the possibility of excessive saving, which could lead to secular stagnation: deficit spending is, therefore, good for the economy.

 

Mankiw continues his attack on this proposition and finds that: “Few economists today believe that excessive saving threatens the economy”. I spare you the rest of the paper, but the lesson should be clear: economists are human, they make mistakes. It is the task of today’s economists to find out where they went wrong and then to rebuild economics to provide guidance for economic policies that are to the benefit of society. There is no need to crucify economists like Mankiw (why should anyone to that anyway?), it is time for the discipline to move on.


Responses

  1. […] https://econoblog101.wordpress.com/2015/09/21/the-reincarnation-of-keynesian-economics/ […]


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Categories

%d bloggers like this: