Posted by: Dirk | November 13, 2012

Long-Run and Short-Run Determinants of Sovereign Bond Yields in Advanced Economies (except Japan)

The IMF has a new working paper out, and the title is the one above safe for the term in brackets. As I have often argued here in this blog, I agree with Richard Koo in that Europe is in a balance sheet recession. This means that the private sector wants to deleverage and does not want to borrow more, so government is free to borrow without creating inflation. Nevertheless, in a new paper the summary reads like this (my highlighting in bold):

We analyze determinants of sovereign bond yields in 22 advanced economies over the 1980-2010 period using panel cointegration techniques. The application of cointegration methodology allows distinguishing between long-run (debt-to-GDP ratio, potential growth) and short-run (inflation, short-term interest rates, etc.) determinants of sovereign borrowing costs. We find that in the long-run, government bond yields increase by about 2 basis points in response to a 1 percentage point increase in government debt-to-GDP ratio and by about 45 basis points in response to a 1 percentage point increase in potential growth rate. In the short-run, sovereign bond yields deviate from the level determined by the long-run fundamentals, but about half of the deviation adjusts in one year. When considering the impact of the global financial crisis on sovereign borrowing costs in euro area countries, the estimations suggest that spreads against Germany in some European periphery countries exceeded the level determined by fundamentals in the aftermath of the crisis, while some North European countries have benefited from “safe haven” flows.

So, let us take a look at Japan, the only advanced economy that had a collapse in both real estate and stock markets for the last 20 years. The slide if from Richard Koo’s Nomura presentation:

So, government debt moves up from 40% to 140% of GDP. That should, according to the IMF study, increase government bond yields by 200 basis points, which is the same as 2%. Being very fair to the IMF, let us look at the yield of 10-year government bonds of Japan. They went down from about 7 to 1.5%, not up to 9% as predicted by the study.

If you search for “Japan” in the IMF paper, it comes up 4 times, 2 times in footnotes and once in the main text and in a table. There is a ‘Japan dummy’. I can quite imagine who the ‘Japan dummy’ is here.

Advertisements

Responses

  1. “Private sector has a balance sheet recession.” We may agree on it but it is the “effect”. Determinism explains that nothing will happen without the presence of necessary conditions. So, what were the necessary conditions present to cause a balance sheet recession? Definitely it might not be any wishful thinking of entrepreneurs. Perhaps we might find one clue if you post GDP to total banks’ assets ratio for each country in euro-zone.
    Hema/N.Y.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Categories

%d bloggers like this: